Tuesday, 08 September 2009

  • Gestalt's Dharmachakra

    God isn't dead, God is the universe. Explaining the universe and God doesn't help me a bit though. I was still sad. The Dharma helped me understand myself. Now, The Buddha, God's corpse, The universe and I are all quite happy.

    Atheism

    God is not dead as the phrase "God is dead" implies. Of course, Nietzsche was speaking of God within his sociocultural context. IMO, Atheism was an exit for me. An exit from the protestant-fundamentalist expectations I grew up with. It was my way of overcoming my past and evolving into what I perceived as Ubermensch. 

    At that time I saw belief in God as a source of internal-struggle. I went from being fairly well adjusted living at home and going to church at 15 to living away from home. To reconcile my need for self-actualization , it was important that I change my definition of a "Good Man" to something I could perceive as more progressed or evolved. If I hadn't then I would have had to hold myself personally responsible for some of the terrible choices I made. Rather than deal with the emotional conflicts that lead to me moving out, I chose to change my perception of reality by experimenting with substances. 

    Experimenting with substances allowed me to perceive the world in a new way which I could confidently say was more well thought out than my previous system of belief. My atheism was a denial of God explained through evolution. I said that God did not create man, Man created God because faith in the unknown and inconcrete was an evolutionary necessity. Faith was a sufficient adaptation, but not necessarily an adaptation that produced rational concepts. Faith is a product of natural selection. Just like all patterns that persist, they are to at least some degree results of selection on some dimension of complexity. 

    Gestalt Organicism

    After years of this atheism, I began to change my mind. I considered the nature of living things and came up with a theory that closely resembled Organicism and Kurt Goldstein's work on Gestalt Theory. If the behavior of the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Then the nature of the universe in terms of dimensional complexity must be greater than the sum of each part. Considering the nature of human cognition and consciousness, I then determined that aggregate behavioral structure of the universe is at least in part composed of our own human consciousness. Just like neurons in our brain exhibit their individual characteristics which together make up our consciousness. So to do our consciousnesses together up the higher consciousnesses. 

    Atheism lead to a degree of emotional detachment and an unrealistic expectation of self-initiated deterministic outcomes. Organicism allowed me to consider that emotions had a purpose that shouldn't be counted out simply because the were remnants of adaptations necessary for survival. Organicism allowed me to consider that there were higher "meta" emotions experienced by the higher consciousness. It was during this time I came up with the idea that our purpose in life was to  reciprocate the compassion and consideration the higher consciousness has extended to us. 

    Dharmachakra

    I discovered the Dharma in 2008. I found this video by the Dalai Llama explaining the basics and became very curious. If it were not for the Dharma, I would have not been likely to have as easily discovered the roots of my own inner emotional turmoil. Up until then, I was so busy explaining my reality that I could not consider myself critically. I was simply reacting my whole life to everything. I never considered that what I do not need to explain is the metaphysical context of my existence. Explaining the world around me allowed my to objectively consider my environment, but it didn't really help me to evolve my being. My being was not really evolving in practice, because I was only re-organizing my perception of the world outside of me. I wasn't fixing myself, I was changing how I saw the world. 

    I learned about attachment and anatta. The concepts of samsara and the upside-down views of reality people accept to feel better about themselves. In attachment, one of 2 things can happen: Either what you are attached to will disappear, or you will disappear. I realized that I was attached to people's reaction's to me. I was attached to positive reactions to my presence and suffered when I was not validated at the right time by the right people. I held myself personally responsible for the way people didn't react like I had hoped they would react to me. Its why throughout high school I was so hard on myself, because I took things personally when I couldn't get the response from my classmates that I had hoped for. When their perception of me went out of control, I suffered more and more. 

    My first girlfriend Katrina didn't like a few things about me, I changed them and she must have seen me as passive and too insecure to be with long term and she broke up with me. I did drugs for years as an entry into social circles and a way to initiate drug-dependent relationships to fuel my need for social validation. I took this so far it went out of control. I used drugs to gain acceptance in situations where no acceptance was possible by being perceived as a drug user. I guess I was hoping that only the un-enlightened would see me as cool and eventually everyone would see the light of drugs. I was pretty wrong about that one.

    When I left Drury and started working, I was attached to my suggestions and initiatives. Those suggestions of others, were less valuable to me because they had less potential to feed my attachment to validating responses and encouragement. This hurt me for years in business.

    In my relationships. I was attached to a need for me to be someone awesome for the other. I was attached to myself being needed to help the other person. Understandably of course, I was also attached to being loved. This savior complex proved to be a terrible premise for a relationship . 

    When I realized that I have no control over others, their behaviors, their responses, the way they feel about me, and then accepted it, I began to find freedom from my turmoil. I cannot save the world. I cannot get people to accept me or like me. I simply have very little influence in those chains of dependent origination. What I can do is act to benefit others altruisticly. Escape my attachment to self-concept and self-view. Escape the tomorrow and the yesterday and consider the instant. Exist without consideration or reactionary analysis to every concept that pops in my head. See what is seen, Hear what is heard and make our spirits like a clear mirror reflecting the universe harmoniously.

Thursday, 05 March 2009

  • Remembering our TRUTH, releases our FEARS.
    Releasing our fears, releases our LAUGHTER, frees us to BE Happy, JoyFULL, Appreciative, GreatFULL, Honoured, Humbled, Blessed.
    Releasing our FEARS, empowers us to BE our TRUTH.

    -(http://www.twitter.com/radiate)

Thursday, 17 April 2008

  • Infinite Debt

    I came to a point where I encountered a long forgotten pattern of emotional self destruction. I would ponder how there is no one around me, and therefore, no one cares and no one is concerned about me. I would conclude that I do not matter and ponder all my insecurities and perceived inadequacies till I would feel so bad that I would physically hurt inside and become sick.
    Upon contemplating the nature of good and evil in my understanding of the world, I came to the conclusion that the greater consciousness (the aggregate of systems) in its divine mercy has given me so much .. abstract wealth.  There is so much in the world that exists because of nature of our environment on this world. Its been so conducive to our flourishing as a global civilization. There is so much, aesthetic quality , even in the ugly , even in the sickening stimuli that crawl to and fro in the nether regions of my sub consciousness. There is so much expression , freely given to man. It seems to me, that even in one who is suffering to an indescribable degree, the fundamental gift of the greater consciousness to man is our individual consciousness, our position as an element of the greatest element. Our place in the grand design , regardless of how small it seems ... is still a place given , our lives are each an opportunity to change the world forever. No matter how little man has , no matter how much suffering one goes through, there is still ample providence and fortune for our potential so much that to not reciprocate this generosity, I feel is inherently the definition of spiritual death. The greater consciousness has given so much at the risk of its own destruction by the elements that together and as an aggregate, determine its nature (us). There is a loving higher consciousness out there, that regardless of what we do , or how little we acknowledge its existence, still affords to us the opportunity to be immortal through our words and actions in our time in this world.
    How can I sit idly by in complacent squalor composed of those emotionally stagnant patterns of thought that in the end, hinder me and do no good to others in this world. How can I do nothing for others, when the higher consciousness has set such a grand example of relentless compassion and altruistic affection for our individuality. Its true, I feel infinitely obligated to return the favor and reciprocate all that I have been given. I should relentless express the nature of my love for the consciousness and all it has provided for me.

Saturday, 09 February 2008

  • Computer Science and Self-Determination

    I have a teacher that believes the idea that computers could be programmed to act as humans implies a threat to the idea of self-determination and more precisely, believes that a programmable consciousness would be counterintuitive.

    When he speaks of AI he says that if a computer could replicate a human consciousness that such would imply that our actions are deterministic in nature, and therefore he has no decision making power.

    I disagree, and I state that being programmed need not necessarily imply that there exists within us a predetermined autonomous consciousness that is void of the characteristic of true self-determination or traditional free will.

    To be programmed need not indicate that one's actions are predetermined.

    To be programmed is a rather flexible state of result wherein the configuration may either be fixed, or dynamic.

    To say the state of configuration is fixed is to say that our decisions are pre-programmed, and our actions are determined from a "script" that defines how we are to act in many situations.

    To say the state of configurations is dynamic is to say that our decisions are determined from a framework of self-determination learned from the process of survival and development.

    When our configuration of cognition is dynamic, we learn to learn, and our cognitive facilities are developed according to necessity and environment. Our own cognitive facilities are unique to our experience, and each of our experiences is unique to each of us. In such a manner, each of us is unique in our decision making process and our method of conceptualizing our reality. Suffice to say, that our cognitive framework with respect to our individual lives - is unique to our experience ... and thus our decisions are unique to our own unique framework. In summary, our decisions are each our own and our will is self determined, yet may be categorized as deterministic according to our individual experiences and innate (genetically inherited) cognitive pathways and tendencies as made apparent by the sequence of events that form our historical experience of existence in each of us.

    So it is possible to program a machine to be self-aware. Because self-awareness is simply the feedback of previous states analyzing the homeostatic configuration of possible conclusions with respect to the sensory and cognitive state of the previous self. This pattern of deliberation or "selection of the most suitable path to satiety" is the ultimate goal of a cognitive entity. Our way of existence, mirrors the aggregate logos of the universal affinity to order from chaotic constituency.

  • THe conciousness objection

    It is a response to Hobbes, the consciousness objection states that consciousness is not a corporial motion, in other words, the act of self-determination and autonomous behavior cannot be explained in an entirely deterministic world. In yet more other words, mentality is fundamentally immaterial.

    I believe that the idea that any act of coming to a realization implies communication between two persons in separate moments in time (unknowing previous self that determines the conclusion (the speaker of the monologue), and the knowing self that interprets and reanalyzes the conclusions of the former) - this is the idea described earlier in asynchronous duality.

    based on that, we can determine that being aware of one's own consciousness is simply a byproduct of this feedback mechanism. An important byproduct that allows us to think along circular lines towards a goal that the mind sees as necessary to fulfill the deficits in satiation caused by misalignment of the environment with the higher and lower needs of the self.



Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.